David Cameron signs up to muscular liberalism

By Peter Hoskin

“State multiculturalism has failed.”

Angela Merkel put voice to that sentiment last October. Now it David Cameron’s turn to do the same. In a speech in Munich today, the Prime Minister has taken a rhetorical torch to Islamic extremism. “Frankly,” he says, “we need a lot less of the passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism.” It is, at the very least, a significant political moment.

What Cameron is doing here – as explained by Charles Moore and Paul Goodman – is publicly signing up to a philosophy of the world. It is a philosophy that rejects the idea that extremism should simply be contained. Instead, it says that extremism must be fought – and that means engaging in a battle of ideas. “Tough on extremism, tough on the causes of extremism,” is how Tony Blair might have put it. “This is the battle that must be won, a battle not just about the terrorist methods but their views. Not just their barbaric acts, but their barbaric ideas. Not only what they do but what they think and the thinking they would impose on others,” is how Tony Blair did put it.

The policies for waging this battle are varied and, in many cases, indirect. Immigration, schooling, even housing – all have an impact in this area. But there are also specific instances where this government should make its thinking clear. From deciding which organisations to engage with, to – yes – what should be said in speeches; all this matters. Cameron’s words today suggest that he recognises this. If groups and people fail the tests of liberal society, he argues, “the presumption should be not to engage with [them]. No public money. No sharing of platforms with Ministers at home. At the same time, we must stop these groups from reaching people in publicly funded institutions.”

Whether this will cohere into an effective stand against extremism, we shall see. There are several barriers in Cameron’s way, including political divides and general state inertia. And the government must also take care to target genuine extremists and their poisonous ideology, rather than stoking paranoia and fear all round. But our Prime Minister has set out his approach today. He is, it seems, determined to act against homegrown terror in all its manifestations. Which is to say: passivity no more; muscular liberalism from here on in.

Coffee House: The Spectator Blog

Advertisements

~ by admin on February 5, 2011.

One Response to “David Cameron signs up to muscular liberalism”

  1. How can we define muscular liberalism for Pakistan? I mean, there needs to be counter-extremism involved, but it has to include education, social security, social safety nets, rule of law and societal tolerance to actually work and even extend to counter-terrorism.
    What is going to be the muscle? Speeding up legal recourse and action? Or rallies and taking to the streets? Is it going to be the five-year vote, or the activity and social development within those five years, regardless of which political party or paradigm is in power?
    Pakistan needs to figure out what each political ideology means to it and its people. It should also work out how to rank and rate individuals as well as associations according to the traditional spectrum, or any new spectrum or valuation if applicable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: